Latest News RSS FeedLatest News

Canterbury Scientists Slam AgResearch GE Testing

agresearch logoUniversity of Canterbury genetic scientists have produced a report which slams AgResearch for conducting what it says is deliberately conducted superficial testing when disposing its of its genetically modified animals.

The report by Professor Jack Heinemann says that AgResearch ignored the concerns of ERMA, the Environmental Risk Management Agency, about the possibility of horizontal gene transfer from genetically modified animal corpses, and conducted its experiments in such a way as to avoid finding GM contaminations.

Professor Heinemann argues AgResearch’s testing methods meant it would ignore up to 99.9 percent of potential GM contaminations in the organisms surrounding the corpses.

A spokesman for AgResearch claimed the organization had only just received the report and could not yet comment.

“We’ve only just got it ourselves so we’re still putting a response together.”

However, the Journal of Organic Systems report says AgResearch was provided with a draft copy of the final report nearly 7 months ago on 23 November 2010.

2 comments for “Canterbury Scientists Slam AgResearch GE Testing”

  1. Gravatar of Steffan BrowningSteffan Browning
    Posted Sunday, 8 May 2011 at 6:08:40 a.m.

    AgResearch seems to be stuck on misrepresentation, first of all by pretending it is doing meaningful gene transfer research, then reporting that the research proved something, and now pretending they have not seen the Journal of Organic Systems - Centre of Integrated Research in Biosafety Report. The spin from the Crown Research Agencies including Scion and Plant & Food Research around their GE research is a risk to public and environmental safety and the GE research needs to be stopped immediately. The tens of millions of dollars of tax payers money propping up the GE research for the benefit of major United States partners to the CRIs could be better spent on research for less risky and more sustainable production such as organics and biological farming.

  2. Posted Sunday, 8 May 2011 at 10:48:35 a.m.

    GE Free NZ did contact 5 other scientists to peer review the AgResearch data from the report "Microbial characterisation of soils from offal pits" which can be found at http://www.gefree.org.nz/assets/Microbial-characterisation-of-soils-from-offal-pits.pdf.
    This included two scientists whose names were put forward by AgResearch, however they never submitted any comment.

    The INBI review has been further peer reviewed by the Journal of Organic Systems international reviewers.

    We are pleased that such a reputable journal as the J. of Organic Systems (JOS) has considered it for publication.


Post a comment

Fill in the fields below to respond.